Government failed to address 'severe reality of housing crisis' , as affordability gap widens
Property affordability ratios across England are worse than at any point since reports from the Office of National Statistics began in 1999.
The Office of National Statistics has just released its latest report on Housing Purchase Affordability in Great Britain 2021.
The report shows that in the financial year ending March 31, 2021, the average home sold in England cost the equivalent of 8.7 times the average annual disposable household income, while in Wales the ratio was 6.0, and in Scotland it was 5.5.
While purchase affordability ratios for the average home are below their peaks in Wales (2007) and Scotland (2008), affordability ratios in England are the most stretched since the series began in 1999.
Across English regions, an average-priced home in the North East cost the equivalent of almost 12 years of income for a low-income household (10th percentile) compared with 40 years in London.
In the most affordable English region, the North East, low-price homes (10th percentile) are available at around five times a 10th percentile or higher disposable household income.
In London, low-priced homes (10th percentile) are available at five times an 80th percentile or higher disposable household income.
James Forrester, managing director of Birmingham-based Barrows and Forrester, said: “The Government has a great deal to answer for when it comes to the plight of today’s homebuyer.
“For years, they’ve insisted on fuelling buyer demand while failing to address the severe reality of the housing crisis by actually building more homes and this has pushed house prices to record highs.
"As a result, the initial cost of a mortgage deposit has also spiralled and now acts as a huge financial barrier, preventing many from realising their dream of homeownership.”
Managing director of HBB Solutions, Chris Hodgkinson, added: “The cost of homeownership is severely out of kilter with the reality facing many homebuyers when it comes to the money they earn, the amount they are able to save and the sums required to purchase a home.
“This has caused many to have borrowed beyond their means while mortgage rates have remained favourable. But with this cost of borrowing now starting to climb, we can expect to see those that have over committed find themselves in financial turmoil as they struggle to cover this increased cost on a below par level of income.”
CEO of Octane Capital, Jonathan Samuels, said: “Despite the nation’s homebuyers enjoying a period of affordability with respect to mortgage rates and monthly repayments, the high cost of securing a mortgage alone has prevented many from climbing the ladder.
“This is due to the fact that property values have increased considerably, but also as a result of comparably stagnant wage growth, not to mention the high cost of renting that prevents many from saving a substantial mortgage deposit.”
Director of Benham and Reeves, Marc von Grundherr, said: “Climbing the ladder is incredibly tough in today’s market, where only those with the financial collateral of an existing property can comfortably negotiate the cost of a property purchase.
“It’s not just an insufficient level of wage growth and the high cost of a deposit pricing many out of the market, there’s additional costs such as stamp duty and solicitors fees.
“No wonder we’re seeing a move towards long-term renting as a lifestyle choice, not just a necessity.”