Eco-homes development blocked on site of controversial pig farm in south Warwickshire over definition of what constitutes ‘open countryside’

Councillors were told that there had been overwhelming support from nearby residents, some of whom had lived with smells coming from the site
Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now

A housing development that would have seen a pig farm replaced by wind turbines and eco-homes, some of which would have been built into the ground, has been blocked due to a council’s definition of what constituted ‘open countryside’.

Members of Stratford District Council’s planning committee were told at their latest meeting [Aug 17] that an industrial pig processing plant housing up to 15,000 pigs and the focus of protests and break-ins was not considered to be a brownfield site ripe for redevelopment.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Planning officer Charlotte Dicks explained: “We consider that the site is in the open countryside - we do not consider it as being previously developed land.”

A housing development that would have seen a pig farm replaced by wind turbines and eco homes, some of which would have been built into the ground, has been blocked due to a council’s definition of what constituted ‘open countryside’.A housing development that would have seen a pig farm replaced by wind turbines and eco homes, some of which would have been built into the ground, has been blocked due to a council’s definition of what constituted ‘open countryside’.
A housing development that would have seen a pig farm replaced by wind turbines and eco homes, some of which would have been built into the ground, has been blocked due to a council’s definition of what constituted ‘open countryside’.

And planning manager Dale Barker added: “If it is used for growing food then it is not previously developed land and pigs are food. It doesn’t matter that it looks like previously developed land, it doesn't meet the definition and we cannot adjust it.”

Councillors were told that there had been overwhelming support from nearby residents, some of whom had lived with smells coming from the site at Hogwood Farm, Oxhill. Two parish councils, the local district councillor and more than 50 neighbours backed the plans.

Cllr Penny-Anne O’Donnell (Con, Ettington) said: “This is farming on an industrial scale. I would ask you not to consider this as an application in picturesque open countryside, it is far from that.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“Local people want this to happen, the applicant has worked proactively with the local community. The proposal is innovative and forward looking and incorporates the home offices that we now utilise and the energy efficient design. This is exciting and our opportunity to lead on a Grand Design standard development.”

Cllr Chris Mills (Con, Kineton) added: “Personally I think this is a good scheme. You have all the credentials - solar panels, wind turbines and it is a very nice looking site which would improve on what is there.”

But councillors rejected the plans by eight votes to three after being advised that it would be unsuitable in the open countryside.

Cllr Nigel Rock (Con, Napton and Fenny Compton) said: “We have a heart and head problem here. To any lay person it is going to look better than it does at the moment. However, you can't drive a horse and cart through our policies.

“If we are going to say that if a business is struggling we are going to come up with a residential development in the countryside then we haven’t got a planning policy any more. I have a great deal of sympathy but I cannot see a way that our planning policy allows it.”