Plans for chicken farm in Norton Lindsey thrown out once more - much to the delight of residents

Access issues have scuppered the latest plans to build two replacement poultry houses in Norton Lindsey.
Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now

Similar proposals were twice thrown out by Warwick District Council and subsequent appeals lost prior to the latest application being considered by the council’s planning committee when it met on Wednesday (January 11).

Read More
Plans for chicken farm in Norton Lindsey could be scuppered by access issues

A report by planning officer Dan Charles had recommended that this was also refused due to an objection from Warwickshire County Council’s highways department.

Access issues have scuppered the latest plans to build two replacement poultry houses in Norton Lindsey. Photo suppliedAccess issues have scuppered the latest plans to build two replacement poultry houses in Norton Lindsey. Photo supplied
Access issues have scuppered the latest plans to build two replacement poultry houses in Norton Lindsey. Photo supplied
Hide Ad
Hide Ad

In concluding his report, Mr Charles said: “In the opinion of the local planning authority, the development proposed fails to demonstrate that vehicles serving the site can adequately enter, manoeuvre and exit in a forward gear.

"Due to the nature of the vehicles to be servicing the site, the proposal is considered to inadequately demonstrate that safe and appropriate access can be provided.”

Applicant Ali Audhali had hoped to replace two disused timber poultry sheds, with two new ones of a similar size on the land off Warwick Road in the village.

The access to the site would have been moved and there were also plans for single-storey farm manager’s house.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

It is nearly 20 years since the first plan was dismissed for the replacement units and other applications for housing on the site have also been rejected.

Norton Lindsey Parish Council objected to the latest plans along with more than 100 residents who raised a number of concerns including problems with odour, light pollution and the access although the council’s environmental health officer had raised no concerns.

Ward member Cllr Jan Matecki also objected. He said: “The application has been heard several times previously under one guise or another and been rejected on every occasion.

“I particularly draw your attention to two previous applications, W/05/1754 and W/08/0146, which were heard in 2007 and 2010 respectively and which were rejected by Warwick District Council.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

"The decisions were upheld by different inspectors, appointed by the Secretary of State to review the appeals made in both of these applications.

“The fundamental reasons for rejecting the applications, and subsequently verified by the inspectors after appeal, are still valid, if not more so, today.”

For years residents have been fighting against the numerous applications for the site.

The news that the plans were thrown out were welcomed by many living in and around the village.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

One resident, Heidi Bottomley, said: “After three and a half years, the hen farm application was refused.

“This victory was entirely down to Cllr Jan Matecki and without his efforts we would have been sunk.

“I emailed him (along with countless others over the years) in desperation a couple of years back. When no one else would help, he took it and ran with it.

“His five-minute delivery at the meeting challenging the types of the truck transportation quoted and practical issues was what caused Highways to object to the plans, and he has been working throughout behind the scenes and researched to the nth degree, to fight these plans on our behalf.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“If Marvel created a public servant superhero, we feel it would be Jan.

“I know everyone in the village feels we owe Jan a huge debt of gratitude.”

Matt Western, MP for Warwick and Leamington added: “I am relieved the council have finally decided to shut down this flawed proposal.

"Residents of Norton Lindsey have been resolute in their opposition to this proposal since it was first raised almost four years ago, and I have been pleased to stand with them throughout.”