Leamington landlord fined more than £30k after subletting out 'dangerous' house
A Leamington landlord has been fined more than £30,000 after he was found guilty of three housing offences.
It was was discovered that the six-bedroom property in Sydenham, which Grzegorz Surminski was renting out, posed a serious health and safety risk to his tenants.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdSurminski had rented the property in St Brides Close through a letting agent and was sub-letting the property to eight sub-tenants when the property was inspected by Warwick District Council (WDC) housing officers in February 2022.
The property was reported to WDC for disrepair by one of the sub-tenants.
Surminski had not applied for a House of Multiple Occupation (HMO) licence for letting the property to so many tenants and had not provided safe or adequate measures for his tenants.
On inspection it was found there was no working smoke detection, no fire doors in the property, no fire blanket in the kitchen or fire extinguishers in the property – all legal requirements for an HMO property.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdAs well as the lack of fire safety provisions, there were numerous repair issues also found including unsafe electrics, lack of a working shower and broken floor tiles in the bathroom.
A tenant was provided with a mouldy mattress to sleep on, and there were large accumulations of rubbish in the rear garden as well as insufficient wheelie bins for the size of the household.
Surminski was found guilty last month by a District Judge at Coventry Magistrates Court and fined a total of £31,300. In total he was fined:
- £10,000 for failing to apply for a HMO license
- £10,000 for failing to comply with an Improvement Notice for the fire safety provisions
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide Ad- £10,000 for failing to comply with the HMO Management Regulations
Surminski also received a £1,000 fine for failure to provide written information to the council regarding the ownership and occupation details of the property.
He was also ordered to pay a £150 victim surcharge and £150 costs.
The property has since been vacated and is now empty.